Dear reader,

INTRODUCTION
Welcome to the MCSS Electronic Review Package in message format. 

Thank you for agreeing to review a paper for the journal 
Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems (MCSS). 
The quality of our field is critically dependent 
on your volunteer efforts as a reviewer. 

The Editors of MCSS want to make the formal part of the 
review procedure as convenient as possible. For submission of a 
review they have developed a review form in message format.
Electronic transmission of a review is faster and uses less paper.

Thank you in advance for your important reviewing work to the field.

Bradley Dickinson, Eduardo Sontag, Jan H. van Schuppen (Editors)


PS. The document MCSS Review Guidelines is available on the web at the URL:
http://www.cwi.nl/~schuppen/mcss/mcssrevguide.html

Cut here ------------------------------------------------------------

Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems (MCSS)

MCSS Review Form (message format)


Recommendation of Reviewer to Associate Editor

Paper
MCSS.PAN Paper number 
TITLE 
AUTHORS

Reviewer
% Associate Editor, please enter data on reviewer
X Reviewer number 
REVIEWER NAME
ADDRESS
EMAIL ADDRESS
DATE Due date of review


Recommendation
% Please select your recommendation from one of the options 
% listed below and by erasing the other options.
Recommendation: Accept paper
Recommendation: Minor revision
Recommendation: Major revision
Recommendation: Reject

Opinion summary
% Select one of the following options and erase the other options
Overall rating: Very good
Overall rating: Good
Overall rating: Unacceptable

Novelty: Very original
Novelty: Novel
Novelty: Nothing new

Substance: Major contribution
Substance: Good contribution
Substance: Insufficient

Impact of paper: Both on theory and on applications
Impact of paper: On theory but not on applications
Impact of paper: On applications but not on theory
Impact of paper: Neither on theory nor on applications

Correctness: Correct
Correctness: Minor errors
Correctness: Questionable

Exposition: Excellent
Exposition: Not perfect but can easily be improved
Exposition: Needs major rewriting


Confidential Comments of Reviewer to Associate Editor
Opinion on paper


% The information above this line will not be communicated 
% to the author(s) of the paper. The text below this line 
% will be communicated to the authors of the paper. 


Comments to Authors of Reviewer
Paper
MCSS.PAN Paper number
TITLE 
AUTHORS
X Reviewer number

% Please enter your comments below.
Summary of paper


Opinion on paper


Detailed comments

ITEM1



Cut here --------------------------------------------------------------