Errata for the book
Numerical Solution of TimeDependent
AdvectionDiffusionReaction Equations
W. Hundsdorfer, J.G. Verwer
Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol.33
Springer, Berlin, 2003.
ISBN 3540034404
A number of errors have been corected in the second print (2007).
These are indicated by circles. The others, which are still wrong in
the second print are indicated by bullets.
Line numbers include figure and table captions and section headings.
Negative line numbers indicate the number of lines up from the bottom
of the page, neglecting footnotes.
Formulas are given in (La)TeX style,
indicated by $ . . . $.
Errors corrected in the second print:

Page 70, line 18 : Figure 3.3 should read Figure 3.1 .

Page 75, line 16 : $\e^{tA}\$ should read
$\e^{tA}\_2$ .

Page 192, formula (4.17) : $j = 1, . . . , k1$ should read
$j = 0, 1, . . . , k1$ .

Page 211, line 10 : The sentence "It corresponds to . . ."
should be slightly
changed. The semiimplicit midpoint rule (SanzSerna & Verwer, 1986) is
merely related to (1.26).

Page 227, formula (1.15) : Omit the $h$ before the sum
on the right hand side.
The formula on the bottom of this page (line 7) is to be adjusted
accordingly.

Page 252, line 2 : To avoid confusion, formula (3.11) is better
regarded as a
central scheme around $x_{j1/2}$. Reflection around $x_j$ gives the same
formula on a shifted stencil.

Page 307, line 13 : $ {1\over2} \pi \le \omega_1 , . . . $
should read
$  {1\over2} \pi \le \omega_1 , . . . $ .

Page 315, line 4 : Interchange $\alpha_j > 0$ and
$\alpha_j < 0$ .

Page 357, line 8 : In the formula for $\delta^*_n$, replace
$ \psi $ by $ \psi ' $ .

Page 376, line 21 : $u_1(x,y,t) = c , u_2(x,y,t) = . . . $
should read
$u_1(x,y,0) = c , u_2(x,y,0) = . . . $ .

Page 456, line 4 : Numer. Math. 40, pp. 245296 should read
Numer. Math. 37, pp. 6191 .
Errors still present in the second print:

Page 374, line 1 : In the formula for $R$, middle part,
${\cal O}(t^{s+1})$ should
read ${\cal O}(t^{s1})$ .

Page 381, line 11: That whole line should be removed.
It would only be corect if
$\alpha \ge \frac{1}{2}$.

Page 397, line 5 : In the caption of table 4.2,
scheme (4.8) should
read scheme (4.11).

Page 458, line 13 : Acta Numerica 2002 should read
Acta Numerica 11 .